A few observations following yesterday's game, and the ensuing fallout:
- Over four games, Houston's rebounding advantage now stands at +24, and that figure probably doesn't even do them justice. 36 defensive boards in game 1, 31 in game 2, 32 in game 3, and 16 offensive rebounds yesterday have been one of, if not the, definitive advantages in this series. Two road games lost by a total of four points leads people to point to a lot of different aspects, but there's little doubt in my mind that the second chance points were the Blazer's downfall last night.
- Second to not hitting the boards hard enough, Portland's lack of execution late in the game has been baffling. FTT likes Steve Blake, I love Steve Blake, I think he encapsulates a lot of what this team is all about, and as much as his renewed confidence has gotten Portland very close in the last two games, his mistakes may have had even more of an impact. A poorly chosen shot attempt in game 3 might probably sealed Portland's loss, and a forehead-slapping turnover right after the Blazers had stolen the ball from Yao on the other end really deflated the team - but Blake could certainly spread the blame around in game 4. Whether it was Joel tossing a key offensive rebound halfway across the court, Brandon getting rejected and drawing an offensive foul on what was maybe Portland's most important possession of the game, or Travis jacking up a mind-numbing desperation 3-pointer to tie the game, the Blazers just haven't shown the cutthroat play that earned them the best record in games decided by three or less during the regular season.
- Shane Battier, man oh man. Duke graduate, intellectual guy, speech a little effeminate, tough/smart defensive type, what's not to hate? I don't like dwelling on "what-ifs?", but you have to wonder what this series might look like if not for three or four insanely clutch 3-pointers by Battier late in games 3 and 4, I for one am positive that Portland would most likely have grabbed one of those games. Without T-Mac, it was thought by some that Houston was at a disadvantage by not having a player who could create his own shot late in the game, but clearly the Rockets are not lacking in confidence or ability to hit shots.
- Last, but certainly not least:

This, my friends, IS A FOUL. If the referees are going to call four fouls on our two big men in the first quarter, it just has to go both ways. This is a physical series, the Blazers are playing against a physical team that has gained a reputation of being very chippy, which is fine, but the refereeing in this series has been unbelievably inconsistent. Of all the things to look at, the calls are really the last thing I want to blame for Portland being down 3-1, but when it's just four measly points separating two evenly matched teams, you just can't ignore the fact that Portland has been called for 101 fouls compared to Houston's 83, resulting in 96 free throw attempts for Houston and only 79 for Portland.I think I have ranted long enough, but as for that "still hopeful" part of the title, I can't count this team out of the series. A win Tuesday would force a game 6 in Houston, and it's apparent to me after the last two games that the Blazers are due for a win in Texas.
Links
- Heartwarming writeup on The Schonz
- Two brilliant articles via Truehoop, one by "blogfather" Henry Abbott and the other from Kevin Arnovitz
- He's terrible on "Talkin' Ball", but I really enjoy Dwight Jayne's articles
- Yahoo's Ball Don't Lie has some good stuff on game 4
- Kerry Eggers, Portland Tribune writer, has not lost hope
- Daily Dime doesn't mince words, and the truth is hard to read
- A block from Houston's paper: one, two, three, four! Four articles praising their team's big victory, but all them have this almost "phew!" factor to them, seriously Blazer fans, we haven't lost this series yet










